콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

“The issue of the Upper House election, the consumption tax that is scared of the devil ❗️ Part 1]

[Main subject] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Everyone, even if you make a mistake, the issue of the Upper House election is “constitutional amendment! Defense power is strengthened! 크레이지슬롯 Casino is done.”

Do not be an issue.

The support and support of candidates and political parties are whether or not they are “abolishing the consumption tax”.

Opposition parties have finally begun to “reduce the consumption tax to 5%”, but they are lukewarm!

Everyone, if possible, go to the local candidate office with more than 10 people. The more you have more, the better.

And apply pressure. “5%of you are thinking about” abolition “as a promise?”

→ The answer “I don’t think” is out of the question, so let’s chase “I understand. I’ll do your defeat as much as possible!”

→ It is also out of the question to deceive it as “5%for the time being” or “do what you do before” is out of the question.

→ “Naturally! Like some bad political parties, Corona, war, and prices are depreciated, this is only 0%consumption tax! I will do a fire thief!” You should vote for candidates and political parties who are aiming for clearly.

Kansai people who work for large companies, members of Soka Gakuin, and misunderstand that they only watch TV!

Let you lose your own format in the future! I do not say. Can you cooperate with the reduced number of seats in the self -government just this time alone?

Of course, those who are usually supported by the self -government will be sure to check out the support candidate’s “thinking about consumption tax” and listen directly.

People who say, “I’m always in the LDP and it’s more safe!” How long do you intend to be in the flower garden? Please look at the reality! If you remember “the world 30 years ago” instead of the data, you should not make a stupid choice such as “LDP for the time being”.

I’m not saying because I’m an anti -LDP. I’m not an anti -LDP in the first place.

I’m persistent

In overwhelming victory in the upcoming Upper House election → acceleration of “worst” in the self -government → consumption tax hike, of course, increased social security expenses, reduced pensions, further destruction of the working environment due to immigration policy → Most of the Japanese people Both name and reality

Capitalist, wealthy slaves

It will be.

It’s not like a commentator of a wide show, with a selfish image.

That’s why from here on, I study fun and fun money.

Simply yesterday’s review

The final consumer (hereinafter referred to as the customer) is not paid 10%of the consumption tax.

Customers are just paying a highly set price for the cost of consumption tax that companies and offices (hereinafter, sellers) must pay.

Even if you do not have a tax burden, it is natural that customers will be poor enough to increase the burden on financially enough.

Tax manager → Seller

Taxpayer → Seller

The same tax for taxpayers and taxpayers is called “direct tax”. In short, we were already deceived since the introduction of the consumption tax in 1989.

Which mouth says, “Correct the direct ratio”

By the way, since I learned the real mechanism of consumption tax, let’s think about the meaning of “consumption tax is levied on the seller”.

Yesterday, “consumption tax is levied on the added value of the seller.” Let’s take a concrete example.

(Settings) Annual (taxable) There are companies that have 55 million yen in sales, and we will consider the cost of 22 million yen, such as purchasing values.

Annual sales 55 million yen

Sales cost 22 million yen

Added value 33 million yen (sales -sales cost = added value)

And the added value is distributed.

The breakdown of 33 million yen added is set as follows.

Personnel expenses are 22 million yen, rent and utility bills, maintenance costs, 5.5 million yen, and 1.1 million yen for expenses (entertainment and equipment purchases), and the tax -prone profits are as follows.

Then, added value 33 million yen – (labor costs 22 million yen+maintenance cost 5.5 million yen+various expenses 1.1 million yen) = Corporate tax previous profit 4.4 million yen

If the tax before the tax is 4.4 million yen, the corporate tax is 660,000 yen (Note: Later)

In other words, net income is 3.74 million yen → shareholder dividends, etc.

Note: The number of corporate tax 66 is the amount examined by the corporate tax calculation application.

[Corporate tax calculation. Created from the National Tax Agency material]

This is the setting. Moreover, it will be left before the consumption tax is introduced.

If you make it compact

Annual sales 5500

Annual sales cost 2200

Added value 3300

Labor cost ▲ 2200

Other ▲ 660

Profit before tax 440 ← Corporate tax from here ▲ 66

Net income 374

(The unit is 10,000 yen)

Pattern ① If you suddenly introduce a 10%consumption tax here …

Annual sales 5500

Annual sales cost ▲ 2200

Added value 3300 ← 10%consumption tax is taxed from here. 3300 x 10/110 = ▲ 300

Added value 3000 after tax

Labor cost ▲ 2200 (premise of maintaining employee wages)

Other ▲ 660

Profit before tax 140 ← Corporate tax from there ▲ 21

Net income 119

(The unit is 10,000 yen)

⚠️! Net income is 374 → 119. ▲ 255 is also decreasing‼ ️

No, it’s still good because of net income.

The business size will not be reduced because labor and maintenance costs can be secured, for a while.

Pattern ② If the consumption tax is 10%and the sales decrease (▲ 330)

Annual sales 5170 (▲ 330)

Annual sales cost ▲ 2200 (as if purchasing as unchanged)

Added value 2970 ← 10%of consumption tax from here. 2970 × 10/110 = ▲ 270

Added value after tax 2700

Labor cost ▲ 2200

Other ▲ 660

Before tax transfer profit ▲ 160 ← Because it is in the red, there is no corporate tax

Net profit ▲ 160

(The unit is 10,000 yen)

What a‼ ️ ️ Because of the consumption tax, it is in the red … what a villain …

However, since this still does not change labor costs, maintenance costs, etc., this is still good.

(For a while, if this situation continues, we will have to cut the wage)

and…

Pattern ③ In the case of the management of the consumption tax that the manager wanted.

Up to this point, we have maintained “labor costs 2200 (10,000 yen)”, but this is tax -exempt. In other words, employees are fired only in format and outsourced for outsourcing. Then, labor costs become outsourced expenses and are recorded in sales costs as well as purchased values. Moreover, social insurance is not required. In other words, managers start to cut costs due to consumption tax.

Then, check with the numbers specifically.

When the cost is cut from the decrease in sales of pattern ②

Annual sales 5170 (▲ 330)

Annual sales cost ▲ 4400 (outsourcing costs originally were included in the annual purchase amount ▲ 2200)

Added value 770 ← 10%of consumption tax from here. 😈 770 × 10/110 = ▲ 70

Added value after tax 700

Personnel expenses 0

Other ▲ 660

Tax transfer profit 40 ← Corporate tax ▲ 6

Net income 34

(The unit is 10,000 yen)

It seems that it managed to exceed the penalty branch.

Regular employment was dismissed to prevent the company in the deficit, and as a sole proprietor again, the contracted contract is paid by the National Health Insurance and the National Pension. Moreover, for the convenience of the manager, he works while carrying the fear of being outsourced contract easily.

I think the above three patterns are slightly different from the reality in order to get the understanding of the outline, but it is a reasonable and natural story in micro that managers run pattern ③. prize. The bad thing is “consumption tax”

in short…

Consumption tax destroys the working environment!

about it.

If you think, “Oh, the consumption tax is bad. I’ll exploit the tingling! Let’s become a consumer!”

He has a sober work environment destruction, but has a devil with outstanding destructive power, so keep in mind!

that’s all!

2022/6/23 (cumulative 842 times)

I made the iPhone new last fall (iPhone13 ♡), but at that time I didn’t have the case I wanted, so I bought it with a petit plastic for the time being.

When I bought it, it cost 1,980 yen, and I felt that I could use a coupon. 。 。

I thought it was a little plastic and thought that it was a connection until I bought a new one, but if I use it, it is very convenient to have a pocket on the back, and it will also be a shoulder, so I have both hands even if I go out on holidays. It was good to be able to use a smartphone right away, so I really liked it (laughs)

And I realized that this shape could be used very much with Petit Plastic, so I decided to buy a popular band lieurer iPhone case! !

There are many designs and colors, so I was at a loss in the store, so it is limited to Japan? I made it here for the dark toope ♡

It has a color that seems to be easy to match with anything, the case of the case on the back has a gusset, it is practical to stop it with a hook, and 인터넷카지노 the design is cute (*’ω`*)

It is also a shoulder, but I don’t usually use it (for holidays only), so I purchased the shoulder I have for everyday use.

I usually have a smartphone, so I thought it would be better to have a handle and watched it in the shop.

* You have permission to take a photo shoot.

I was wondering the case with the type with gold studs, so I was worried because the studs on my hand were cute, but it was a little flashy, so I decided to make it the same color as the case safely.

This was also very cute, but I wonder if the length of the shoulder cannot be adjusted, so is it a bit strong and chooses clothes? I gave up crying and crying …

At the store, the dark toope was out of stock, so this is Rakuten ♪

When I go out, I want to keep my hands as much as possible, so it is quite convenient to be able to hold shoulders and hand, and I’m happy to be able to buy something fashionable (*’꒳`*)

♡ Recent Ametopi publication articles ♡

♡ Recent purchased items ♡

Click here for CHI ROOM ♡

답글 남기기

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다